#FRUITY LOOPS VS REASON HOW TO#
#FRUITY LOOPS VS REASON PRO#
#FRUITY LOOPS VS REASON SOFTWARE#
#FRUITY LOOPS VS REASON SERIES#
#FRUITY LOOPS VS REASON FREE#

Reason has to adapt FL's playlist, it really does save a ton of time rather than re-mapping the same notes patterns down over and over again in the sequencer, but if they feel they can't do this then they can AT LEAST make it possible to copy and paste notes patterns. Reason will have FL's efficient piano roll cursor/mouse thing (As in combining their cursor, pencil and eraser tool into one as FL has it, making it a great convenience.) hopefully this is what Reason3.5 will be like:

#FRUITY LOOPS VS REASON SOFTWARE#

the ultimate music making software will be a combination of Reason and FL! I'll keep Reason dominate here and inbred FL into it. So what have we learned today from my post? That's right. make better beats in Reason though =P it's probably because they have much better default drum samples and drum kits than FL.ДЇL can export as a. It's easier because you can see what is going to play what ALL AT ONCE, but in Reason's reDrum computer you have to switch between slots to see what plays when and sorta memorize it if you're making a beat from scratch so that you have an idea of what to put next. =/ДЇl's 'beat machine' would techincally be more easier to use than Reason's reDrum Computer because all you have to do is get all drum samples you want in a filter group (to keep things organized) and map your sequence/drumbeat down. The only thing FL has over Reason in automation is that in FL you can automate the tempo and in Reason you can't.

Reason's automation set up is insanely easy to get and use.

#FRUITY LOOPS VS REASON PRO#

I'm not much of an FL Pro but it always seemed stupid and confusing they way they did it. You can set up and control automation a shitload better in Reason than FL. Reason's FX also kick Fl's FX's ass all over the place, in lack for having bad synthesizers Reason has amazing reeverb and phaser along with their other neat FX. Reason's FX are a little bit more tricker to put in and apply because of all the wiring that needs to be done, but it's rather simple (input goes to output, output goes to input) and sometimes fun. In Fl it's a lot easier to apply FX like reeverb and phaser because you just go to the FX channels and add them in there. I'd rather they not have their hardware rack view no matter how cool it looks if it meant only getting sucky ass synth sounds.ДЇl is a CPU whore, Reason isn't. Reason kinda traded in quality for looks there I guess, because they just barely manage to fit the 2 OSCs along with the filters and mods. You'd be better off mapping the notes to your song on FL and then export it as a MIDI and import it into Reason if you want to use Reason so bad.ДЄlso Reason does have few synths, it's synthesizers are grossly limited with only 2 OSCs when Fl's Sytrus has 6 OSCs. So when it comes down to mapping notes FL is much much easier and faster than Reason is. in FL you can make patterns and put them down on your playlist which saves you even more time instead of having to rewrite the same notes over and over for like a bassline or harmony or something. In FL you can also copy and paste notes so that saves time too. In FL they combine that all into one and it's much easier. Yea, FL's piano roll is a billion times more efficient than Reason's sequencer, in Reason's sequencer you have to switch constanetly from pencil tool to cursor tool to eraser tool. My rantish thing about Fl Studio 5 XXL veruses Reason 3.0. I've found Reason to be much more CPU intensive than FL, also RAM personaly. This can be countered by fiddling with sample quality.

The only way they are any weaker than their hardware counterparts is there is slight delay while your CPU does the processing. All the synths and modules, apart from the combinator and the matrix, are based of real-world models, and have like capabilities.

#FRUITY LOOPS VS REASON HOW TO#

forgot who it was, its accurate enough to teach you how to use these modules in real life, which is invaluable if you want to go onto production. It took me about 2 hours to get used to hooking up the sequencer, and as mentioned by sombody else. Once you get the hang of that, reason is fairly simple. This is basicaly pure sequencer, with no frills, meaning you can safely learn without being distracted.

#FRUITY LOOPS VS REASON SERIES#

the Cubase VST series is a good place to start. If you want to get into reason, start by playing around with midi, like the cut-down versions of cubase. Fruityloops really limits you to more electronic styles, while reason can beautifuly emulate acoustic guitars and string quartets.

#FRUITY LOOPS VS REASON FREE#

I've always found reason to be more free and more creative. FL is very good for begineers, as the learning curve is MUCH shallow than that in reason.

Fruity loops vs reason